The Oakland County Sheriff's interpretation of the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act (MMA) and the Controlled Substances Act has forced two local marijuana facilities to lock their doors. One of the pot-growing operations, Big Daddy's Hydro, in Oak Park, closed voluntarily; the other facility, right here in Commerce Township where this blog post is being composed, was the subject of a task-force raid.
The Oakland Press ran a front-page story on Saturday about Big Daddy's Hydro. The facility was on the receiving end of an Oakland County Sheriff's raid back in January. Since then, the owners were resolved to carry on their operation; an operation they insisted was legal under the MMA. Sounds like a movie might be in there somewhere.
Before Hollywood came knocking to negotiate the movie rights to this true crime drama, however, Big Daddy's in Oak Park locked its doors. The decision was based on the observations of its management group that "patients" were being shook down on the street after leaving the facility. Also, it did not help that four members of the management group were charged with distribution felonies by the Oakland County Prosecutor.
Big Daddy's is consolidating pot growing and distribution operations into their Chesterfield Township facility in Macomb County, and in Detroit. Therefore, Big Daddy's alleged violations of the MMA or the Controlled Substances Act are now in the hands of Prosecutors Eric Smith and Kym Worthy.
The more recent raid on the Commerce Township facility presents an example of an increasingly sophisticated approach to medical marijuana enforcement by the Oakland County Prosecutor. This bust was executed by a joint task force with a federal component; the DEA. [Remember, marijuana remains illegal in any form under federal law.] Also, the Sheriff has commented publicly that the facility violated the Controlled Substances Act, not the MMA.
Criminal defense attorney Neil Rockind was quoted in the Oakland Press yesterday as saying, "They can try to describe it any way they want. I know what happened...and if they want to pursue a case then I'll be there." Yeah, sounds like Neil; never one to shy away from high-stakes criminal defense litigation.
The Michigan Court of Appeals handed prosecutors a serious weapon when it issued its People v McQueen decision last month. The published, thus binding, decision of the Court of Appeals runs a lance through most MMA distribution schemes; at least if those involved want to make any money from their elaborate growth and distribution operations.
This brings us back to the intent of the medical marijuana referendum that passed overwhelmingly by Michigan voters in the 2008 election. The MMA is designed to encourage a "grow-your-own" and "trade-among-friends" approach to distribution.
From the outset, those involved in growing pot have been looking to make money from the provisions of the MMA. Because the Act is silent on pot sales, a legal debate has, er, cropped-up about whether distribution via sale is permitted or proscribed by the Act.
Also, as the Law Blogger has pointed out time and again; the premise of patients getting medical attention from marijuana, although legitimate in a number of cases, is a complete sham in the overwhelming number of patient-care provider relationships. This scam will likely bring down the MMA in the end.
www.waterfordlegal.com
info@waterfordlegal.com
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Neil Rockind. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Neil Rockind. Tampilkan semua postingan
Minggu, 18 September 2011
Sabtu, 18 Desember 2010
Bloomfield Hills' Medical Marijuana Ordinance Challenged in Lawsuit
Bloomfield Hills passed an ordinance in October requiring card-carrying certified medical marijuana users to register with the Bloomfield Township Police Department. The ordinance also requires the submission of a form to the police disclosing the “patient’s” drivers license number and date of birth, whether the patient owns or rents their home, and identifying how many other patients share their home.
In addition, the ordinance limits the number of medical marijuana patients that can live at one address and prohibits growing medical marijuana anywhere in Bloomfield Township. Violation of the ordinance is a 93-day misdemeanor carrying a $500 fine.
Bloomfield Hills is among several municipalities that have passed ordinances that restrict the provisions of the Medical Marijuana Act, criminalize conduct authorized by the Act, or both.
Now the ordinance is the subject of a lawsuit filed against the township by two crafty [their “clients” are John and Jane Doe] veteran criminal defense attorneys: Tom Loeb and Neil Rockind. The lawsuit, undoubtedly heading to the Michigan Supreme Court, does not seek money damages but rather, declarative and injunctive relief.
Township by township, the MMA is coming under fire for a glaring flaw: it is a ruse for recreational pot users. Yes, there are legitimate medical marijuana users out there, in spades, for whom the MMA was designed to help. There are also many “patients” whose medical records were reviewed with a passing glance by a physician more interested in the high-volume review fees than in determining whether the person has a genuine chronic medical condition of the sort required by the MMA. The LawBlogger wonders how many certified users, among the tens of thousands of backlogged applicants, are under the age of 25; or are college kids whose only chronic condition is their desire to party down.
As these legal challenges grind through the court system over the next two or three years, the MMA will be subject to death-by-ordinance on a township-by-township basis. Attorneys Rockind and Loeb remarked in their press conference announcing their lawsuit that the ordinance in Bloomfield Hills cannot stand to the extent it contradicts a valid Michigan law.
While it may not be the best example of tightly drafted legislation; while it undoubtedly suffers from problems of perception and misconception, the MMA is a valid state law. The appellate courts will have no choice but to invalidate ordinances that limit the scope of the Act, or criminalize it’s legitimate purposes.
Once again, we pose the question: should marijuana just be outright legalized in Michigan? We are interested in your view on this subject. To weigh in, simply comment on this post or register a comment on the discussion board of our FaceBook fan page.
For more information about the MMA and its certification process, click on this link.
Ludington Update: Bloomfield Hills is not the only municipality seeking to restrict the use of medical marijuana; check out the moratorium proposed in Ludington.
Royal Oak Update: Feb 3, 2011. Now, Royal Oak is getting in on the act of restricting patients' rights under the MMA by proscribing grow operations within the city limits.
Ann Arbor Update: Of all places, Ann Arbor is also getting in on the ordinance dance. For its part, however, there seems to be a delay in bringing the issue to a vote, as the AA City Council continues to revise the proposed ordinance. Compared to other municipalities, the ordinance proposed in Ann Arbor seems much more in-tune with the MMA. As the city attempts to properly define the terms of its ordinace, one medical marijuana entrepreneur is challenging the ordinance in a law suit before it has even passed, claiming unconstitutional vagueness.
Montana Update: For it's part, the Republican-controlled state legislature is poised to pass a bill repealing the MMA in that state.
info@clarkstonlegal.com
http://www.clarkstonlegal.com/
In addition, the ordinance limits the number of medical marijuana patients that can live at one address and prohibits growing medical marijuana anywhere in Bloomfield Township. Violation of the ordinance is a 93-day misdemeanor carrying a $500 fine.
Bloomfield Hills is among several municipalities that have passed ordinances that restrict the provisions of the Medical Marijuana Act, criminalize conduct authorized by the Act, or both.
Now the ordinance is the subject of a lawsuit filed against the township by two crafty [their “clients” are John and Jane Doe] veteran criminal defense attorneys: Tom Loeb and Neil Rockind. The lawsuit, undoubtedly heading to the Michigan Supreme Court, does not seek money damages but rather, declarative and injunctive relief.
Township by township, the MMA is coming under fire for a glaring flaw: it is a ruse for recreational pot users. Yes, there are legitimate medical marijuana users out there, in spades, for whom the MMA was designed to help. There are also many “patients” whose medical records were reviewed with a passing glance by a physician more interested in the high-volume review fees than in determining whether the person has a genuine chronic medical condition of the sort required by the MMA. The LawBlogger wonders how many certified users, among the tens of thousands of backlogged applicants, are under the age of 25; or are college kids whose only chronic condition is their desire to party down.
As these legal challenges grind through the court system over the next two or three years, the MMA will be subject to death-by-ordinance on a township-by-township basis. Attorneys Rockind and Loeb remarked in their press conference announcing their lawsuit that the ordinance in Bloomfield Hills cannot stand to the extent it contradicts a valid Michigan law.
While it may not be the best example of tightly drafted legislation; while it undoubtedly suffers from problems of perception and misconception, the MMA is a valid state law. The appellate courts will have no choice but to invalidate ordinances that limit the scope of the Act, or criminalize it’s legitimate purposes.
Once again, we pose the question: should marijuana just be outright legalized in Michigan? We are interested in your view on this subject. To weigh in, simply comment on this post or register a comment on the discussion board of our FaceBook fan page.
For more information about the MMA and its certification process, click on this link.
Ludington Update: Bloomfield Hills is not the only municipality seeking to restrict the use of medical marijuana; check out the moratorium proposed in Ludington.
Royal Oak Update: Feb 3, 2011. Now, Royal Oak is getting in on the act of restricting patients' rights under the MMA by proscribing grow operations within the city limits.
Ann Arbor Update: Of all places, Ann Arbor is also getting in on the ordinance dance. For its part, however, there seems to be a delay in bringing the issue to a vote, as the AA City Council continues to revise the proposed ordinance. Compared to other municipalities, the ordinance proposed in Ann Arbor seems much more in-tune with the MMA. As the city attempts to properly define the terms of its ordinace, one medical marijuana entrepreneur is challenging the ordinance in a law suit before it has even passed, claiming unconstitutional vagueness.
Montana Update: For it's part, the Republican-controlled state legislature is poised to pass a bill repealing the MMA in that state.
info@clarkstonlegal.com
http://www.clarkstonlegal.com/
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)

